Can government released information be trusted when it comes to UAPs?

Recent events have raised questions about the trustworthiness of government information regarding UAPs and have brought attention to the lack of transparency in the government's handling of such incidents.

The government's history of cover-ups and lack of transparency has contributed to the distrust of the information released in recent UAP events. For years, the government has denied the existence of UAPs, dismissing sightings and reports from witnesses, including pilots. However, the recent UAP events have demonstrated that the government has been aware of such phenomena for some time and has kept it secret.

The WEAPONIZED Podcast, hosted by Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp, this week discussed the validity of quotes directly from pilots. The quick turnaround of articles from various media outlets with varying reports contributed to the distrust of government information, given the classified nature of pilot observables and the rarity of these statements, it seemed unlikely that such open sources would become available so quickly. Some media outlets have released articles with conflicting details, making it difficult to discern what is true and what is not, with some speculating the Pentagon had leaked details in order to control the general narrative surrounding disclosure.

The conflicting details about the objects' capabilities and origins, as well as the limited information released by US intelligence officials, have only added to the confusion surrounding the UAP events. Some experts have suggested that the objects may be experimental technologies developed by Russia or China, while others have suggested that they may be extraterrestrial in origin.

UAP events have highlighted the lack of transparency and trustworthiness of government information, which many in the UAP field have been flagging for years. The government's history of cover-ups and denial has contributed to the distrust of information released about UAP events, and conflicting details and limited information released by US intelligence officials has only added to the air of confusion surrounding the events.